This bottle of 2011 Girard Petit Verdot was sourced at the tasting room in Yountville, ca. We have had this bottle of 2011 Petit Verdot for a while and I believe it came in a wine club shipment. If you have spent any time on my wine blog, you know that I am a fan of Girard wines. They have great wine, at a good price (for Napa).
To the wine: There was a first with this bottle of wine from Girard. This Petit Verdot needed some time to air out. Since the bottle has been in the wine jail for a couple of years, I can rule out bottle shock or wine stored wrong. I took my first sip and the wine felt a little angry. After letting the bottle breath for 30 minutes, it changed its character.
Nose: The nose of the Petit Verdot had a very strong nose. Very little effort with the swirl, gets you a very unique nose. I want to attempt to explain the nose, as a chemical smell. This is not bad, it was just not what I expected.
Tasting Phase: During the tasting phase, I received a combination of spice and strawberry notes. The tasting phase was strong and added character to this unique bottle of wine.
The Finish: The finish on this Girard Petit Verdot was full of spice notes. The finish on this wine was medium warm, and had a hint of strawberry.
Conclusion: Ok, this bottle of wine is pretty unique and not the norm from Girard Winery. That being said, the three phases of tasting this wine brought the nose of the wine into perspective. I would buy this wine again and look forward to my next trip to Girard.
If you have read my posts on Alpha Omega, you will know that both Sandra and I are huge fans of the winery and the wine they produce. The Cabernet Franc is a great example of their level of wine making. Sandra is a big fan of Cabernet Franc’s and when Alpha Omega came out with theirs, we were there to sample it (and buy it). I will admit here that I am biased, but this is a very good bottle of wine. I will keep this short.
Nose: The nose on this Cabernet Franc was light and had some spice and strawberry notes. The nose was enjoyable.
Tasting phase: The tasting phase had some spice notes, with a slight berry notes. I will go as far as to say there was some tangy notes, to the tasting phase.
Finish: The finish had spice and strawberry notes. I found the wine pulls from the back of the tongue. The finish had a quality to it that I have come to expect from Alpha Omega wines.
I can solve the riddle of if we have purchased more of this wine and we have. We are headed to the winery this weekend for a private tasting, with the Director of Sales. He wants some input on the experience at the winery, for its customers. By the way, the view from the tasting area is great in the winter months. Mountains, fog, clouds, and cool weather equal a great tasting experience.
This bottle of Trefethen 2012 Harmony Chardonnay was sourced at the winery, just before the big earth quake that devastated many Napa wineries. We were very surprised when we arrived and found two of our favorite wine servers. Adam from Alpha Omega and Angie from Charles Krug. They both left their mother ships and moved to Trefethen. It was great to see them.
We were given a great tour through the gravity fed winery and they introduced us to their whole product line. The winery looked great. During the earth quake, the gravity fed winery was damaged. It is a shame, it was a really good looking and historic building.
To the wine: This bottle of 2012 Harmony Chardonnay is from the Oak Knoll district of Napa valley. The grapes in this Chardonnay were sourced on the estate of Trefethen.
Nose: The nose on this Chardonnay had very nice floral and fruit notes. The nose was medium in intensity and pleasant.
Tasting phase: The tasting phase was pleasant and full of floral and green melon notes. The tasting phase was distinctive and of quality.
Finish: The finish was very mellow and falls away. There was no warmth and pulls lightly from the middle of the tongue. The finish had some nice fruit notes that lingered.
Conclusion: The name on the bottle of Chardonnay is Harmony. This makes sense because this describes this wine very well. Everything had a balance to it and I have purchased another bottle of this wine.
This bottle of Jonas Red Wine 2010 from Napa was sourced in the Girard Winery tasting room in Yountville, ca. This bottle is normally not available for tasting. I have a philosophy that if I am served the wine, I just might buy it. When I discussed this philosophy with the server, the server opened up a bottle of Jonas. In the end, we purchased a bottle of it.
There was a saying on the label of this bottle of wine and it states “Vinum ex Steriliis.” This is Latin for “Wine of the Barrel.” The wine is a blend Cabernet Franc and Syrah. The production volume of Jonas is 150 cases, so you can see why it is not normally tasted, at the tasting room.
To the wine:
Nose: The nose on this Jonas Red Wine was strong and full of berry notes. Nothing individual dominated the nose of this wine, it was just nice and added to the wine tasting experience.
Tasting Phase: The tasting phase on this red wine, was strong on the berry and spice notes. Nothing overpowering was sensed during the tasting phase, but this is a bolder wine, that can stand on its own.
Finish: The finish on this wine pulls from the full tongue. The spice note was muted on the finish and lost a bit to the berry notes. I really enjoyed the finish on this wine.
Now to the question: Yes I would purchase this wine again. I look forward to next years vintage.
This bottle of Jeff Runquist 2012 Cabernet Franc, was sourced at a tasting room in Amador County. This tasting trip was part an invite from a vendor, who is a friend of mine. Friend first, vendor second. I have never heard of Jeff Runquist, but I can tell you he is a talented guy. I do not have very detailed notes on this wine, because the bottle was opened and drank rather quickly. Sandra and I enjoyed it.
To the wine:
Nose: The nose on this Cabernet Franc was full of berry and spice notes. I would say the nose was medium in intensity.
Tasting Phase: During the tasting phase, the wine gives you a medium heat with a strong spice note. I found this to be very enjoyable and balanced.
Finish: The finish was warm and full of spice notes. I found the finish fades quickly and is a little light. I found the finish to be of quality and the wine is distinct.
In the end, would I buy this wine again and the answer is yes. I do not get to Amador county very often, so the next time I am up there, I will be stopping by the tasting room
I have posted before about having a gift certificate to the restaurant at the winery at Chandon. The restaurant closed and we were left with a gift certificate that had no value. That is until we called the winery. Chandon honored the gift certificate with wine. What a great deal and we joined the wine club and doubled our value.
Sandra and I have had a few different bottles of Chandon’s wines. I normally associate Chandon with sparkling wines. They do some really nice sparkling wines. The Pinot clones (They have several) are very good examples of what can be produced on the Napa valley floor. We have enjoyed Pinot Nior’s clones 667 and 777.
To the wine:
The nose on this Pinot Noir was strong with dark cherry and muted plum notes. I found the nose to be very nice and a good start to a good glass of wine.
The tasting phase. During the tasting phase I received tobacco, and smoke. I found this to be very different from the Pinot Noir’s from the Carneros area. The tasting notes faded slowly.
The finish to this Chandon Carneros Pinot Noir had a small warmth to it. There was a pull on he front of the tongue. The finish stays with you for a while. All and all, this was a nice finish to this wine.
Conclusion: I like this wine and since we are in their wine club, I am sure we will be seeing more of this.
Sandra and I stopped by Beaulieu Vineyards tasting room (George de Latour) back around a year ago and were surprised to walk into a library vertical tasting of George de Latour. We sampled George de Latour from the early 80’s to present. This was a very interesting experience and we have never been able to sample vintages like that. Both of us loved the experience, but vintage wines is not something we are going to invest in. Since we were able to do the library tasting for no cost, it was an easy sale to join their wine club. They just asked us to get a minimum of two wine shipments. This bottle was part of one of those wine club shipments.
This bottle of Beaulieu Vineyards, Rutherford, Napa Valley, Cabernet Sauvignon, Clone 4, stood out to us, when we tasted it at the winery. Sorry for the choppy sentence. What Clone 4 is, is a clone taken from Argentina and then grown in Rutherford AVA (Valley floor) in the Napa Valley. Spoiler alert….this is a great bottle of wine.
To the wine:
Nose: The nose on this Cabernet Sauvignon was full of plum and cherry notes. I would rate the nose to be medium in intensity. There was a hint of spice notes here.
Taste: During the tasting phase I received plum and cherry notes with a very tangy spice notes.
Finish: The finish of this Cabernet Sauvignon was full of fruit notes. There was also a medium warmth to the finish that stayed with you. The finish had a nice spice note and the finish was quality.
I am a huge fan of Alpha Omega winery. I think that they are producing some of the best wine in the Napa valley. Since Sandra and I are members of their wine club, this wine was picked up as part of a wine shipment. We also both enjoy the grounds of Alpha Omega and if you get a chance, you should stop by. This Malbec is a new varietal for Alpha Omega as per my understanding. We sampled this wine at the winery and looked forward to enjoying it at home.
To the wine:
Noes. The nose on this Malbec was light with berry and fruit notes. This is not normal for a Alpha Omega wine. Normally, Alpha produces “Statement” wines, with strong nose. I would have liked a little more nose on this wine.
Taste: During the tasting phase I experienced a berry and spice notes, that pull from the middle of the tongue. The spice notes were very distinctive and welcomed.
Finish: The finish on this Malbec left me with spice and fruit notes. I also could sense the tannis in this wine.
Conclusion: This may surprise you, since I am such a big fan of Alpha Omega, but I do not think this wine is up to the standards of Alpha Omega. Now the bar is set very high for anything they produce, so I am not saying this is a bad bottle of wine. I am saying just the opposite. This is a pretty good bottle of wine, it just is not at the same level as the rest of the Alpha Omega wines. Yes I am being picky here, but I am also being honest.
I look forward to going back to the winery and talking to them about this wine. Maybe sample some more.
Corner Stone Cellars is a tasting room that Sandra and I have visited several times. The other night we were looking for something good and dusted this bottle of 2010 Syrah. The bottle was sourced at the tasting room and this trip was a really nice trip, as everything was available to taste. They have a walk in cellar that is walled in with glass. I noticed some wine that I have never seen before. I made the simple statement of “if you let me taste it, I might just buy it.” I did and everyone was happy that their expensive wines were open for sampling. Good times.
To the wine:
Nose: This Syrah had some very nice spice notes and nothing else. Yep, all spice. There was no detraction from the wine and I did not miss the fruit or strawberry notes.
Tasting Phase: During the tasting phase I was pretty surprised. I tasted this wine at the tasting room, but I never thought I would get spice, cherry and plum notes. This was unique.
Finish: the finish continued with the spice notes that stayed with me for a long time. There was a strong warmth that I thought was a little aggressive, to the finish. I did receive a slight plum note on the finish, but it was very lite.
This bottle of Edmeades 2010 Zinfandel, from the Samrock Vineyard, in Mendocino County, was sourced on our latest trip to Mendocino County. We visited many wineries while we were up there and had a good time. Edmeades is on a hill off the main drag and they had a few good bottles of wine. We were tasting toward the later part of the day, so we were ready to be done for the day. The tasting room was pretty interesting, because of the views and we were the only people in it. The winery was well worth the visit and I do recommend dropping in for a tasting.
To the wine:
Nose: The nose on this Mendocino Zinfandel was very lite, with spice notes. I had to swirl vigorously to get a full sampling of the nose and the spice notes were interesting, in a good way.
Tasting Phase: During the tasting phase I received a very lite strawberry notes and and a huge spice notes. The spice notes were strong. This created a very nice combination.
Finish: The finish had a lite fruit notes, but the spice notes continue and stay with you.
Conclusion: This was a pretty good bottle of wine. When Sandra and I make it back up to Mendocino County, we will be stopping by for another tasting. We will buy this wine again.